![]() |
| Image 1 |
Last week, when I went to IKEA with my family I saw this shelf
unit. The appearance and color were really just nice by looking at it, and I
almost bought it without checking at its usability; usability means the ease of
use of the product. However, it was really fortunate that I did not bought it
immediately because I have faced some difficulties while trying to open the
doors of the shelves.
Difficulties I faced in opening the doors of the shelves
When I
wanted to open the shelf that has been labeled as “1”, I first put my finger
into the spaces between the shelves, just like the image on the right. However,
the spaces between shelves were too small that my finger could not fit into it.
Thus, I had to open from the direction of the blue arrow, which was from the
top right (refer to image 1), and the shelf was opened (refer to image 2).
Then, I tried to open the door of the shelf that has been labeled as “2”
(refer to image). Similarly, I opened the door from the direction of blue arrow
(refer to image 1), but surprisingly, the shelf could not be opened, but it opened when I opened
from the purple arrow (refer to image 1).
Right after that, I thought that the shelves
might be connected because from my past experience only when the shelves that are
connected need us to open the shelves from right to left (refer to image 1 for
blue arrow) and another that from left to right (refer to image 1 for purple
arrow). In fact, as you can see from the images
below you can clearly
see that the shelf “1” and the shelf “2” were not connected.
According to Reimann (2005),
it is important to design a product that corresponds to users’ behaviors,
implicit assumptions, and mental models because having a product that designed in a way that similar
to how users construct their experience with the products can create more
positive user experience. Thus, for shelves that are to open if they are
connected then only they should be designed the way to open the shelf like the
image below as opening in this way is mostly related to connected shelves.
![]() |
| Image 2 |
Suggestion for the design of the shelves' doors
Based on the statement by Reimann
(2005), the suggestion for this shelf is that if the shelves are not
connected, the way to open the shelf should be designed similarly, for example
if shelf “1” is opened from right to left, the other shelves should also be
opened from right to left.. However, this suggestion will only applicable for
shelf “1” to “3” and the other three shelves below the drawer of “4” to “6”.
For the drawer of “4” to “6” (refer to image 2), it should
have a handle for users to indicate pull as not all drawers are designed to be
pulled; some are designed to be opened. Therefore, to easily help users to
understand that the drawers are to be pulled, recommended that handles should
be designed to use to open drawers.
Recommendation in designing the "handle"
Other than that, I found that it was very difficult to open
the shelf that I have labelled as “5” (refer to the image 2). Because the spaces between the drawers were
too small that my finger could not even fit into it, I had to first open the
shelf that was around the shelf “5”, such as open the shelf that has been
labeled as “2” or has been labeled as “4”. It was so troublesome as I had to
take an indirect route to achieve my final goal.
According
to Scott and Erin (2006), finger clearance should be taken into account when
designing the size of a handle; in this shelf, the handle will be the spaces
between the shelves. Hence, recommended that a minimum clearance of the spaces
between the shelves should be 1inch or 2.5cm to easily help users to open or pull
the shelf, which this design of the shelf has violated the recommended design
of handles where the spaces between the shelves were less than 1cm.
References:
Reimann, R. (2005). Personas, Goals and Emotional Design.
Retrieved from
http://www.uxmatters.com/mt/archives/2005/11/personas-goals-and-emotional-design.php
Scott, O., & Erin, T. (2006). Ergonomics and Design : A
reference guide. Retrieved from
http://www.allsteeloffice.com/synergydocuments/ergonomicsanddesignreferenceguidewhitepaper.pdf




No comments:
Post a Comment